Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than HTC U Ultra, having an 81.9 score against 77. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a notably newer cellphone than HTC U Ultra, but it is just a bit heavier and a bit thicker. The HTC U Ultra counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 4 lesser cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a way better looking display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a quite worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes much clearer photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a much better resolution camera in the back and a lot larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The HTC U Ultra has a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 44 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.