Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | Android 14 |
| 2018-01-17 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has an overall score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the HTC U11 EYEs's general score of 76.9. Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 OS, while HTC U11 EYEs works with Android, HTC Sense UI OS. Motorola Edge 50's body is newer, a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than HTC U11 EYEs.
The HTC U11 EYEs counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 features a better screen than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a quite higher number of pixels in each display inch, a quite larger display and a higher 1220 x 2712 resolution.
The HTC U11 EYEs features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 features superior battery life than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 27 percent more battery size.
Motorola Edge 50 shoots much better photographs and videos than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.