Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android, HTC Sense UI | -- |
| 2018-01-17 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than HTC U11 EYEs's score of 76.9. The Samsung Galaxy A50 design is newer, lighter and just a bit thinner than the HTC U11 EYEs. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little sharper display than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a bit higher count of pixels per inch in the display, a little higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bigger display.
Galaxy A50 counts with a little faster processing unit than HTC U11 EYEs. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. HTC U11 EYEs counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little bit better camera than HTC U11 EYEs, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit superior battery performance than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.