Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than HTC U11 life, getting a global score of 87.1 against 74.5. LG Velvet's body is much newer and just a bit thinner than HTC U11 life's, but it's noticeably heavier. LG Velvet has just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U11 life, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The HTC U11 life has a bit more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch. The LG Velvet captures much better videos and photos than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG Velvet also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video and a way more MP camera in the back.
The LG Velvet has a superior memory to install applications and games than HTC U11 life, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 128 GB internal memory. LG Velvet counts with a really longer battery duration than HTC U11 life, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
LG Velvet not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.