Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than HTC U11 life, getting a 90.8 score against 74.5. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G body is noticeably newer, but a little thicker and incredibly heavier than HTC U11 life. HTC U11 life features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels quantity per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has just a bit better performance than HTC U11 life, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC U11 life, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a way better battery life than HTC U11 life, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh. Galaxy A51 5G takes much better pictures and videos than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same video definition and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy A51 5G is also cheaper than the HTC U11 life, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.