Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-11-02 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than the HTC U11 life's 74.5 overall score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Fold is way heavier than the HTC U11 life, it's thinner and newer. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a little better processing power than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM.
HTC U11 life counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller display and a lot worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy Fold takes a bit better photos and videos than HTC U11 life, because although it has a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a much bigger aperture for better low-light captures.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much better memory for applications and games than HTC U11 life, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a very superior battery performance than HTC U11 life, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than HTC U11 life, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC U11 life. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save some money and buy the HTC U11 life, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.