Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than the HTC U11 life, having a overall score of 94.8 against 74.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 is somewhat heavier than the HTC U11 life, it's just a little thinner and a lot newer. The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a slightly better looking display than HTC U11 life, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a better pixels density and a larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11 life, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a bit superior CPU than HTC U11 life, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S20 features a superior battery duration than HTC U11 life, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh. Galaxy S20 takes better photos and videos than HTC U11 life, because although it has a back facing camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations.
The Galaxy S20 costs a lot more money than HTC U11 life, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.