Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the HTC U11 life, with a global score of 81 against 74.5. Galaxy XCover Pro is a noticeably newer device than the HTC U11 life, although it is somewhat thicker and way heavier. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than HTC U11 life, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The HTC U11 life features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. The Galaxy XCover Pro captures just a bit better photos and videos than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and a much more megapixels back camera.
The HTC U11 life has a little bit better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy XCover Pro has a really longer battery duration than HTC U11 life, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
The Galaxy XCover Pro is more expensive than HTC U11 life, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.