Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-02 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.87 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 349.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is better than the HTC U11 life, getting a global score of 87.9 against 74.5. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design is a lot newer, but notably heavier and just a little thicker than the HTC U11 life. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has just a bit better looking display than HTC U11 life, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little better processing power than HTC U11 life, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The HTC U11 life counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a really longer battery duration than HTC U11 life, because it has an 81 percent more battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than HTC U11 life, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.