Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-05-18 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Silver and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro is slightly better than HTC U11, getting a general score of 78.3 against 77.6. The vivo X70 Pro is a just a little bit heavier phone than HTC U11, but they are equally thin. Vivo X70 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
HTC U11 counts with a little sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Vivo X70 Pro counts with much more storage for apps and games than HTC U11, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X70 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X70 Pro captures much better photos and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same video resolution and a F1.7 aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has higher video frame rate, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a way larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.