Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-30 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is better than HTC U12 Life's score of 74.4. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version and HTC U12 Life has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction is incredibly newer and just a little thinner than HTC U12 Life's, although it's also just a little bit heavier.
HTC U12 Life has a little more vivid screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of display. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better processor than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a better camera than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U12 Life, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The HTC U12 Life has improved battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.