Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-30 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a bit better than HTC U12 Life, with a 79.4 score against 74.4. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has the older 14 version while HTC U12 Life has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G body is much newer and a bit thinner than HTC U12 Life's, although it is also heavier.
HTC U12 Life counts with an extremely better CPU than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little more vivid display than HTC U12 Life, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U12 Life, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a much better battery duration than HTC U12 Life, because it has a 39% more battery capacity.
Galaxy A35 5G has a better camera than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a larger aperture for better images and videos in low light environments and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.