Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-30 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is way better than HTC U12 Life, with a 94.8 score against 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy S20 body is newer, a little lighter and a bit thinner than HTC U12 Life. These phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version and HTC U12 Life has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a better display than HTC U12 Life, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a quite bigger display and more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S20 has just a little better processing power than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S20 has much more storage to install applications and games than HTC U12 Life, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with just a little better battery duration than HTC U12 Life, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Galaxy S20 features a superior camera than HTC U12 Life, because although it has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.