Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-08-30 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than HTC U12 Life's 74.4 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is newer, but way thicker and way heavier than HTC U12 Life. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has older 8.0 Oreo version and HTC U12 Life has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U12 Life. They have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a better looking screen than HTC U12 Life, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bigger storage to install applications and games than HTC U12 Life, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. HTC U12 Life counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back camera with way more MP and a way higher video quality.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with superior battery lifetime than HTC U12 Life, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.