Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 2.3 | -- |
| 2011-02-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 3.99 x 2.34 x 0.49 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.70 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 180 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.93 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 720 x 480 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1230mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 360 hours standby time 7.1 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a lot better than the HTC Wildfire S, getting an 83.8 score against 48. Samsung Galaxy A50's design is extremely newer and much thinner, but also way heavier than HTC Wildfire S. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a brighter display than HTC Wildfire S, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a way greater count of pixels per inch of display and a lot bigger display.
Galaxy A50 features a much better storage to install applications and games than HTC Wildfire S, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior hardware performance than HTC Wildfire S, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 7 more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A50 features a much better camera than HTC Wildfire S, because it has a way more mega-pixels back camera and a much better (Full HD) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a way better battery life than HTC Wildfire S, because it has a 225 percent larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit more expensive than the HTC Wildfire S, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.