Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 2.3 | -- |
| 2011-02-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 3.99 x 2.34 x 0.49 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.70 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 180 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.93 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 720 x 480 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1230mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 360 hours standby time 7.1 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is way better than HTC Wildfire S, getting a score of 83.8 against 48. The Samsung Galaxy A50 construction is newer and extremely thinner than HTC Wildfire S's, although it's also a lot heavier. The Galaxy A50 has a much better screen than HTC Wildfire S, because it has a way better number of pixels per inch of screen, a really larger screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than HTC Wildfire S, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 has a much greater hardware performance than HTC Wildfire S, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 3,5 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50 captures much better pictures and videos than HTC Wildfire S, because it has a camera in the back with a way higher 25 mega pixels resolution and a way better 1920x1080 video quality. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much longer battery duration than HTC Wildfire S, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A50 costs a little more money than HTC Wildfire S, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.