Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.80 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus, having a global score of 83.7 against 56.8. Even being the best we compare here, the LG V50 ThinQ is a just a bit thicker and way heavier cellphone than the Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus. These devices include Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus has Android 4.4.2.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better performance than Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a larger amount of RAM. The Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus features just a bit better display than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, a way smaller display and a much lower 1920 x 1080 resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ takes much clearer photographs and videos than Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus, although it has a back-facing camera with lot less MP resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much longer battery lifetime than Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Karbonn Titanium Octane Plus, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.