Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Karbonn | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-04-01 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.80 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is way better than Karbonn Titanium Octane, with an 83.7 score against 54.4. Although the LG V50 ThinQ is newer than Karbonn Titanium Octane, it's a lot heavier and a little bit thicker. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Karbonn Titanium Octane has Android 4.4.2 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better display than Karbonn Titanium Octane, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a bigger display and a much greater number of pixels per inch of screen. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Karbonn Titanium Octane, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Karbonn Titanium Octane, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better camera than Karbonn Titanium Octane, although it has a worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a way better battery lifetime than Karbonn Titanium Octane, because it has a 100 percent greater battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.