Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-01-20 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.50 x 2.95 x 0.63 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 9.81 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 24.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a score of 76.4, which is a little bit better than the Kyocera DuraForce Ultra's global score of 72.2. The Motorola Droid Turbo is an older device than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, but Motorola could make it much lighter and way thinner. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS, but Motorola Droid Turbo has a newer 4.4.4 version and Kyocera DuraForce Ultra has Android 10, so it provides some nice extra features and increased performance.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features just a little better performance than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a sharper screen than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better camera than Kyocera DuraForce Ultra, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos and a camera with less megapixels resolution. Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a superior memory for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Kyocera DuraForce Ultra features a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 15 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.