Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Kyocera | |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-07-22 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.66 x 2.85 x 0.42 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 220 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 600 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is much better than Kyocera Hydro Wave, having a overall score of 81.6 against 52. The Google Pixel 2 is a noticeably newer phone, and it's also just a bit lighter and a lot thinner than Kyocera Hydro Wave. Google Pixel 2 counts with a lot better processing power than Kyocera Hydro Wave, because it has more cores and more RAM.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a sharper display than Kyocera Hydro Wave, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Google Pixel 2 also has much more pixels per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 1920. Google Pixel 2 takes greater photos and videos than Kyocera Hydro Wave, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Google Pixel 2 has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Kyocera Hydro Wave, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 120 GB more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 2 counts with a little better battery life than Kyocera Hydro Wave, because it has a 2700mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 2 costs a little more money than Kyocera Hydro Wave, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.