Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 41.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Lava | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.47 x 2.38 x 0.49 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.17 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 244 hours standby time 11.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is way better than the LAVA Iris 350's 41.3 general score. Both devices we are comparing here use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and LAVA Iris 350 has Android 4.4.2. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is incredibly thinner but notably heavier than LAVA Iris 350.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much better performing processor than LAVA Iris 350, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way better screen than LAVA Iris 350, because it has a lot bigger screen, a much higher display density and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than LAVA Iris 350, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ has a much better battery duration than LAVA Iris 350, because it has a 186 percent larger battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ shoots much clearer photos and videos than LAVA Iris 350, because it has a back camera with a much better resolution.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also the cheapest one, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.