Search


Compare phones

Samsung Star

GT-S5230
Global Score
36.238.4
Basic Information
LGSamsung
--2009-03-10
3.87 x 1.94 x 0.64 inches4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches
3.36 ounces3.25 ounces
$ 100.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches3 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
182 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
6.15.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
1 GB internal memory51,2 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
1.40.4
Camera
2.00 MP3.20 MP
320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
4.735.39
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
350 hours standby time
4.5 hours talk time
800 hours standby time
10 hours talk time
2.242.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 2.1
GPS--
--Accelerometer
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Samsung Star is just a bit better than the LG Chocolate 3, getting a score of 38.4 against 36.2. The Samsung Star design is just a little lighter and a lot thinner than the LG Chocolate 3. Samsung Star counts with a CPU that's very similar to the processing unit in LG Chocolate 3, both have 0 cores.

The LG Chocolate 3 counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Star, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 320 x 240 and a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density. LG Chocolate 3 features a superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Star, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.

Samsung Star captures better photos and videos than LG Chocolate 3, and although they both have the same (QVGA) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Star also has a much higher resolution back facing camera. The Samsung Star counts with greater battery lifetime than LG Chocolate 3, because it has a 25% more battery size.

Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Star is also a lot cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.