Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is better than the LG G Flex 2's score of 75.2. The Google Pixel 5 is a notably newer cellphone, and it's also a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than LG G Flex 2. The LG G Flex 2 features a bit better performance than Google Pixel 5, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64 bits processor and an extra graphics processor.
The LG G Flex 2 features a brighter screen than Google Pixel 5, although it has a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a little bit worse pixel density and a little smaller display. Google Pixel 5 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 5 features a very superior battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4080mAh battery capacity. Google Pixel 5 counts with a much better camera than LG G Flex 2, although it has a worse video resolution and a back camera with lesser mega pixels resolution.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G Flex 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG G Flex 2, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.