Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Oxford blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has a score of 84.6, which is better than the LG G Flex 2's 75.2 overall score. Even though the Motorola One 5G is heavier than LG G Flex 2, it's a little bit thinner and newer. The LG G Flex 2 features a more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G, although it has a little smaller screen, a just a bit worse pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
The Motorola One 5G counts with much more storage for apps and games than LG G Flex 2, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB and more internal memory. The LG G Flex 2 features a bit faster CPU than Motorola One 5G, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a graphics processor.
Motorola One 5G features a really longer battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola One 5G counts with a greater camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One 5G also has a back facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G Flex 2. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Motorola One 5G, else you can save some money and buy the LG G Flex 2, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.