Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is just a bit better than LG G Flex 2, having a score of 80 against 75.2. The Motorola One Zoom construction is extremely newer and just a little thinner, but also much heavier than the LG G Flex 2. LG G Flex 2 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an additional graphics processor.
LG G Flex 2 has a much better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom, although it has a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a little lower pixel number in each display inch and a little bit smaller screen. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a greater camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Motorola One Zoom counts with much more memory to install applications and games than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 128 GB, the Motorola One Zoom also has more internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Zoom has improved battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G Flex 2. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the LG G Flex 2, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.