Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S is a bit better than LG G Flex 2, with a 75.8 score against 75.2. Nubia Red Magic 3S's construction is incredibly newer, but just a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier than LG G Flex 2. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but nubia Red Magic 3S has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, giving lots of additional features and enhanced performance.
LG G Flex 2 features a bit superior processing unit than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64-bits CPU. LG G Flex 2 features a sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better amount of pixels in each display inch.
Nubia Red Magic 3S takes greater pictures and videos than LG G Flex 2, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels. Nubia Red Magic 3S has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a really longer battery performance than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G Flex 2. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG G Flex 2, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.