Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 185.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.58 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 has a score of 81.3, which is a bit better than LG G Flex 2's global score of 75.2. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A31 has a newer 10 version while LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version. The Galaxy A31 design is noticeably newer and a bit thinner, but also heavier than LG G Flex 2.
LG G Flex 2 features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an extra graphics processing unit. LG G Flex 2 counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A31, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse pixel density.
The Galaxy A31 counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A31 counts with a very superior camera than LG G Flex 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A31 also has a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A31 features a really longer battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.