Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-01-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the LG G Flex 2, getting a overall score of 98.9 against 75.2. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0 version, providing some nice extra features and improved performance. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner, but extremely heavier than LG G Flex 2.
The LG G Flex 2 has a little better processing power than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and an additional GPU. The LG G Flex 2 has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a just a little worse pixel density, a way smaller display and a way lower resolution of 1920 x 1080.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots greater videos and photos than LG G Flex 2, because it has a lot better video definition and a much more MP back camera. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G Flex 2. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG G Flex 2, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.