Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is better than LG G Flex 2's overall score of 75.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a bit heavier than the LG G Flex 2, it's somewhat thinner and way newer. LG G Flex 2 counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. The LG G Flex 2 features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64 bits processor.
Galaxy Note10 shoots better pictures and videos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a camera with a worse resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a little better battery life than LG G Flex 2, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G Flex 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G Flex 2. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the LG G Flex 2, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.