Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-01-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Gray and Red | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is better than the LG G Flex 2's global score of 75.2. Samsung Galaxy S10e's body is much newer, just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the LG G Flex 2. The LG G Flex 2 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy S10e, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an extra graphics processor.
LG G Flex 2 has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, a bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution. The Galaxy S10e shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a lesser megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than LG G Flex 2, because it has more internal storage and an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy S10e counts with just a little better battery lifetime than LG G Flex 2, because it has a 3100mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S10e costs a lot more money than the LG G Flex 2, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.