Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | -- |
| 2013-10-28 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.32 x 3.21 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Gray | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 445.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 624 hours standby time 19.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is way better than LG G Flex's overall score of 68.1. Galaxy Note9's construction is noticeably newer than the LG G Flex's, but it is thicker and heavier. The Galaxy Note9 features a bit better looking screen than LG G Flex, because it has a lot higher amount of pixels per display inch, a lot better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a little larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Flex, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note9 features a bit better hardware performance than LG G Flex, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 features just a bit longer battery life than LG G Flex, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Galaxy Note9 takes a lot better photos and videos than LG G Flex, because although it has a less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy Note9 is a bit more expensive than the LG G Flex, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.