Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 9.73 x 5.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 17.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Silver | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 224 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the LG G Pad 5, with an 83.7 score against 70.8. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and LG G Pad 5 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the LG V50 ThinQ and the LG G Pad 5 were released with only 6 months difference, LG V50 ThinQ's construction is a bit thicker but way lighter.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better looking display than LG G Pad 5, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG G Pad 5, because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better performance than LG G Pad 5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM. LG G Pad 5 features a much better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 105% greater battery capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG G Pad 5, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with lot more MP.
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than LG G Pad 5, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.