Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 4.1.2 | -- |
| 2013-10-10 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.91 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 200 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6577 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX531 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.15 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 872 hours standby time 16.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is way better than LG G Pro Lite Dual, having a general score of 80.7 against 57.8. The Google Pixel 3 XL is a a lot newer and thinner phone than the LG G Pro Lite Dual, although it's heavier. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a better looking screen than LG G Pro Lite Dual, because it has a way higher 1440 x 2960 resolution, a bit larger display and a much better display pixels density.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than LG G Pro Lite Dual, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a much better performing processing unit than LG G Pro Lite Dual, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL features just a little better battery lifetime than LG G Pro Lite Dual, because it has a 9% greater battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL captures way better videos and photos than LG G Pro Lite Dual, because it has a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a way better (4K) video quality.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 3 XL is also cheap compared to the LG G Pro Lite Dual.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.