Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.1.2 | -- |
| 2013-10-10 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.91 x 3.03 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 200 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6577 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX531 (200 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.15 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 872 hours standby time 16.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a lot better than LG G Pro Lite Dual, having an 83.8 score against 57.8. Galaxy A50's body is way newer and somewhat thinner than LG G Pro Lite Dual's, but it is also just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit sharper display than LG G Pro Lite Dual, because it has a larger screen, a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much higher pixels count per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a superior processing unit than LG G Pro Lite Dual, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores (and also faster). The Galaxy A50 has a much better memory for applications and games than LG G Pro Lite Dual, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 has superior battery life than LG G Pro Lite Dual, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh. The Galaxy A50 captures way better photos and videos than LG G Pro Lite Dual, because it has a camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot higher video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little more expensive than LG G Pro Lite Dual, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.