Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2013-08-07 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force is just a bit better than the LG G2, with a 75.8 score against 73.7. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Moto Z Force has a newer 7.0 Nougat version and LG G2 has Android 4.4.2, giving a couple additional features. The Moto Z Force construction is a lot newer and thinner, but heavier than LG G2.
LG G2 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG G2 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. LG G2 has a better looking screen than Moto Z Force, although it has a bit smaller display, a just a bit lower screen density and a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
Moto Z Force features a very superior storage for games and applications than LG G2, because it has more internal storage. Motorola Moto Z Force shoots a bit better pictures and videos than LG G2, because it has a lot higher (4K) video quality, a lot higher resolution camera and a much bigger aperture.
Moto Z Force has a little better battery lifetime than LG G2, because it has a 17 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Moto Z Force is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G2. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get LG G2, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.