Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 11 |
| 2013-08-07 | -- |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 159.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G is just a bit better than LG G2, getting a general score of 77 against 73.7. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has the previous 11 version and LG G2 has Android 4.4.2. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G is a heavier but thinner cellphone than the LG G2. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than LG G2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and more processing cores.
LG G2 features a little bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has much less brightness, a really smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixel density. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots a lot better photographs and videos than LG G2, because it has a much better (4K) video resolution, a lot bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than LG G2, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The LG G2 features a superior battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.