Compare phones
LG G2
AT&TD800
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2 | Android 14 |
| 2013-08-07 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.45 x 2.79 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 159.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 696 hours standby time 17.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than the LG G2, with a 77.8 score against 73.7. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is much heavier than LG G2, it's way thinner and also noticeably newer. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the previous 14 version and LG G2 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better display than LG G2, because although it has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a much bigger screen, a way brighter screen and a way higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than LG G2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
LG G2 counts with a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 14 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior camera than LG G2, because it has a way bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low light situations, a way higher video resolution, a back camera with much more megapixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than LG G2, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save some money and buy the LG G2, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.