Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-10 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.86 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 163.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the LG G6's 75.6 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version and LG G6 has Android 9.0 Pie. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's body is noticeably newer and thinner than the LG G6's, but it's notably heavier.
The LG G6 has a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 4 lesser processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a brighter screen than LG G6, because although it has a lot lesser pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a way bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G6, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG G6, because it has a 73 percent more battery capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than LG G6, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a much better 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G6. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the LG G6, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.