Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, getting a general score of 87.1 against 81. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is notably newer, but just a little thicker and heavier than LG G7 ThinQ. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the older 14 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The LG G7 ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has much lower brightness and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots better photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have a F1.6 aperture, the same video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more memory to install games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way better battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.