Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has a score of 81, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 general score. The LG G7 ThinQ body is just a little thinner and lighter than the Galaxy A25 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before. These phones have Android OS, but LG G7 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14, so it offers a couple nice extra features and optimized performance.
LG G7 ThinQ has an extremely better processor than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. LG G7 ThinQ has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same screen brightness, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A25 5G has a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A25 5G features a little bit better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much better battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.