Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-06-01 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is much better than the LG G7 ThinQ's general score of 81. Galaxy A52 5G's construction is extremely newer, but heavier and a little thicker than LG G7 ThinQ. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. LG G7 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a slightly better storage for apps and games than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much better battery duration than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.