Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-06-01 | -- |
| 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.71 ounces | -- |
| Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 170.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3120 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 563 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is a bit better than LG G7 ThinQ's general score of 81. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 has 14 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy S25 is a a lot thinner and lighter cellphone than LG G7 ThinQ. Galaxy S25 counts with a display that's just as good as LG G7 ThinQ's screen, because although the Galaxy S25 has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a much worse display density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a much brighter screen.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG G7 ThinQ has a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy S25 has a much better camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor, a lot higher video definition and a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera. The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with better battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G7 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the LG G7 ThinQ, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.