Compare phones
Motorola Droid Turbo
32 GB| Global Score | |
| 66.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-05-04 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.85 x 2.95 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 277 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.36 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is much better than the LG K30, getting a overall score of 76.4 against 66.8. Even being the best we are comparing here, we must note that it is also way older, notably thicker and a little heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Droid Turbo has older 4.4.4 version while LG K30 has Android 7.1 Nougat.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a superior performance than LG K30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a graphics co-processor and a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a way better looking screen than LG K30, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much greater count of pixels per inch of screen and a much better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Motorola Droid Turbo captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG K30, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and video and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. The LG K30 features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with better battery lifetime than LG K30, because it has a 3900mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Motorola Droid Turbo is also the cheapest one, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.