Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than LG K51S's overall score of 74.3. The LG V35 ThinQ is an older phone than the LG K51S, but LG managed to make it thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. LG V35 ThinQ has a much more vibrant display than LG K51S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing unit than LG K51S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 3 GB more RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior camera than LG K51S, because although it has a way less megapixels camera in the back, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The LG K51S counts with a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG K51S also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB. LG K51S has superior battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ costs more than LG K51S, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.