Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a score of 80, which is a bit better than the LG K51S's global score of 74.3. Although the Motorola One Zoom and the LG K51S were only released with a couple of months difference, Motorola One Zoom's construction is a little lighter but just a little bit thicker. LG K51S features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Zoom, although it has 1 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG K51S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Motorola One Zoom features a much better camera than LG K51S, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The LG K51S counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB. The Motorola One Zoom's battery duration is just as good as the LG K51S one.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG K51S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG K51S. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the LG K51S, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.