Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 190.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is better than the LG K51S's 74.3 global score. Motorola razr (2020) is a just a bit thinner cellphone than LG K51S, but both have equal weights. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but the Motorola razr (2020) has a newer 11 version while LG K51S has Android 10, providing some extra features and enhanced performance.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit faster processor than LG K51S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little sharper display than LG K51S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 876 x 2142 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG K51S has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB. The LG K51S features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG K51S, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG K51S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG K51S. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Motorola razr (2020), else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG K51S, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.