Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is a lot better than the LG K51S's 74.3 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a a little bit lighter cellphone than the LG K51S, but they are equally thin. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has the newer 11 version while LG K51S has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a much better display than LG K51S, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy A52s also has a higher pixels density and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features just a bit better hardware performance than LG K51S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has 3 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A52s features a much better camera than LG K51S, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality. The Galaxy A52s counts with a slightly better storage to install games and applications than LG K51S, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB against 2 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a little better battery duration than LG K51S, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.