Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and Titanium | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is much better than LG K51S, with a overall score of 89 against 74.3. The Galaxy Note10 is a somewhat lighter and a bit thinner phone than LG K51S, although they were released only 8 months apart. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little faster processor than LG K51S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has 5 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a sharper screen than LG K51S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2280. LG K51S counts with a better storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 2 TB.
Galaxy Note10 has a superior camera than LG K51S, because although it has a back facing camera with a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. LG K51S counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG K51S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG K51S. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG K51S, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.