Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-11-23 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than LG K52, having an 81.3 score against 76. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is noticeably older than the LG K52, it's body is lighter and somewhat thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way better display than LG K52, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a lot more pixels per screen inch.
The LG V35 ThinQ's memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as the LG K52 one, both have equal 64 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than LG K52, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG K52 has better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. LG V35 ThinQ takes clearer videos and photos than LG K52, because although it has a lot less megapixels back-facing camera and a way smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting much worse quality videos and images, it also counts with a way better video definition and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.