Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-11-23 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than LG K52, getting a global score of 81.2 against 76. LG V40 ThinQ's body is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter than LG K52, although it was released many years before. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better hardware performance than LG K52, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ has a much sharper display than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better pixels number per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
The LG V40 ThinQ captures slightly better videos and photos than LG K52, because although it has a much worse resolution camera in the back and a way smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot worse image and video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The LG V40 ThinQ and LG K52 have very similar memory to install applications and games, both have the same internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K52 counts with superior battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.